Application Number: AU 2026201563

Smarter Surgery Stryker’s Robotic Arm Gets a Pause-and-Resume Capability

Stryker's invention introduces a surgical manipulator system with a dedicated method for resuming semi-autonomous tool path operation after an interruption. The system is designed to operate in semi-autonomous mode, during which a controller calculates an instrument feed rate - the velocity at which an energy applicator, such as a cutting or drilling tool, advances along

Open for Public Inspection
AU 2026201563 Featured Image

View the Smarter Surgery PDF

Download the PDF version of this Application Open to Public Inspection

Surgical robotics leader Stryker Corporation has filed a patent for an enhanced surgical manipulator system that allows robotic-assisted procedures to be paused and seamlessly resumed – a practical but critical capability that addresses one of the real-world challenges of operating in a semi-autonomous surgical environment.

The Problem

Robotic-assisted surgery has transformed a wide range of orthopaedic and neurological procedures. Modern surgical robots can guide instruments along precisely calculated tool paths, reducing the variability that comes with purely manual technique and enabling surgeons to operate with greater accuracy and confidence. However, the practical realities of the operating theatre mean that procedures are rarely uninterrupted. Unexpected movements, the need to reassess anatomy, or simply the requirement to pause and reposition can all interrupt a robotic system mid-task.

The challenge is what happens next. When a robotic manipulator operating in semi-autonomous mode is paused – whether deliberately or because the surgeon momentarily releases the control – the system needs to know how to resume in a way that is safe, predictable and accurate. Simply stopping in place and waiting is not always sufficient, because the surgical instrument may have shifted or the patient may have moved slightly, meaning the previously calculated tool path position is no longer aligned correctly.

Current approaches to this problem tend to be either overly conservative – requiring the surgeon to manually re-establish position – or insufficiently precise, risking misalignment when the system restarts. There has been a clear need for a smarter resume function that can intelligently return the instrument to its correct position along the tool path without requiring manual repositioning or restarting the entire path calculation from scratch.

What This Invention Does

Stryker’s invention introduces a surgical manipulator system with a dedicated method for resuming semi-autonomous tool path operation after an interruption. The system is designed to operate in semi-autonomous mode, during which a controller calculates an instrument feed rate – the velocity at which an energy applicator, such as a cutting or drilling tool, advances along a pre-planned surgical path.

The key element is a hand-held pendant, which is the physical interface the surgeon uses to control the robotic system during a procedure. The pendant features a first control member that must be held in a depressed state to keep the system operating in semi-autonomous mode. If this control is released, the system immediately pauses. This dead-man’s switch design is a deliberate safety feature, ensuring the surgeon always retains active control over whether the robot is moving.

When the surgeon is ready to resume, the system does not simply restart from where it stopped. Instead, the invention’s logic guides the instrument back to the correct position along the tool path before continuing forward progress. The second control member on the pendant allows the surgeon to modify the feed rate in real time during semi-autonomous operation, providing an additional layer of control and adaptability. Together, these features allow for a surgical workflow that is both safe and efficient, accommodating the natural rhythm of complex procedures without sacrificing precision.

Key Features

Dead-man’s switch control. The primary control member must be actively held in a depressed state to maintain semi-autonomous operation, ensuring the robotic manipulator pauses immediately upon release and cannot continue without deliberate surgeon engagement.

Intelligent path position resumption. Upon reactivation, the system guides the surgical instrument back to the correct tool path position before continuing forward movement, preventing misalignment errors that could result from a mid-procedure pause.

Adjustable instrument feed rate. A dedicated second control member on the hand-held pendant allows real-time adjustment of the speed at which the energy applicator advances along the tool path, enabling surgeons to slow down or accelerate based on intraoperative conditions.

Semi-autonomous mode architecture. The broader system supports a semi-autonomous operating mode in which the controller manages path execution while the surgeon retains physical oversight through the pendant, combining robotic precision with human supervision.

Multi-inventor, multi-patent lineage. This application is a divisional of an earlier Stryker application (AU 2025201896), reflecting a programme of ongoing refinement and expansion of robotic surgical technology.

Who Is Behind It?

This application comes from Stryker Corporation, one of the world’s leading medical technology companies headquartered in Kalamazoo, Michigan. Stryker’s robotics division, which includes the Mako robotic-arm assisted surgery system, has become a major force in orthopaedic surgery. The inventors – David Gene Bowling, John Michael Stuart, Jerry A. Culp, Donald W. Malackowski, Jose Luis Moctezuma de La Barrera, Patrick Roessler and Joel N. Beer – represent a team with deep expertise spanning surgical robotics, control systems and instrument design.

Why It Matters

As robotic-assisted surgery becomes more widely adopted, the ability to handle interruptions gracefully becomes increasingly important. Surgeons do not operate in perfectly controlled conditions – unexpected findings, brief pauses to reassess, or the practical requirements of a busy operating room all mean that a robotic system must be able to accommodate disruption without compromising safety or accuracy.

Stryker’s approach reflects a sophisticated understanding of surgical workflow. By building in an intelligent resume capability alongside real-time feed rate control, this invention addresses the gap between theoretical robotic precision and the messy reality of clinical practice. For patients, this could translate to more consistent surgical outcomes with fewer complications arising from repositioning errors. For surgeons, it offers a more intuitive and responsive robotic partner – one that works with them, not against them, when the unexpected occurs.


AU 2026201563 was published in the Australian Official Journal of Patents on 19 March 2026 and is open for public inspection. Patent applications represent inventions that are sought to be protected and do not necessarily reflect commercially available products.

Disclaimer

The information presented in this article is provided for general informational and illustrative purposes only.

Content on this page may be derived from publicly available intellectual property records, including patent documentation and related materials. While reasonable care is taken in compiling and summarising this information, ATMOSS does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, currency, or reliability of any content presented.

This article is not a substitute for reviewing the original source documents. Patent applications, specifications, claims, and related records may contain detailed technical, legal, and contextual information that is not fully represented in this summary.


ATMOSS does not provide legal, technical, or commercial advice. Users should not rely on this content for decision-making purposes.
For authoritative and up-to-date information, users should refer directly to the official records available via IP Australia and other relevant intellectual property databases. Links to these official sources are provided where applicable.


ATMOSS accepts no liability for any loss, damage, or consequences arising from the use of, or reliance on, the information contained in this article.